WD Red NAS SSDs Boost NAS Performance in Home and Work Offices

WD Red NAS SSDs Boost NAS Performance in Home and Work Offices

At home and in the office, people are looking to keep their data safe – from work documents to family photos to music and movie archives and more. Doing so goes beyond simply storing data to backing up data. And one of the main ways to accomplish this goal is with network-attached storage (NAS). In a NAS system, data is centrally stored on a handful of bays, typically filled with hard disk drives (HDDs) or solid-state drives (NAS SSDs). Multiple users can access this data through a local area network (LAN) via Ethernet.

Demands to store, share, and access personal data are increasing. As a result, NAS devices are tasked with balancing scalable performance and affordable cost. Now, NAS applications for small office and home office (SOHO) can get a huge performance boost from WD Red™ SA500. This blog post highlights our testing results using this NAS SSD as a caching device for both hybrid and full flash NAS configurations.

NAS SSDs

Meet WD Red SA500, a NAS SATA SSD

The WD Red SA500 NAS SATA SSD brings together speed, endurance, and flexibility for reduced latency and improved responsiveness. Available in either a 2.5” or slim M.2 form factor, the drive is ideal for caching – whether online databases, NAS systems, 4K and 8K video editing, or other uses. Capacities for this SATA SSD reach up to 4TB to meet your data storage needs.

Test Bench

We partnered with QNAP®, a global provider of network attached storage and video surveillance solutions, and chose to perform the tests on the TSU-963X, a NAS box that offers great expandability with five, 3.5” and four, 2.5” bays. It was a perfect match for both our cached mode and full flash configurations to be tested, since we could fit four SSDs in the 2.5” bays. Additionally, the device offers a standard 10Gb Ethernet (Gbe) interface, which provides a high-level of performance to the network.

Our test bench included a single PC with the following specifications:

  • Intel® Corei5-9600K CPU
  • 16GB DRAM
  • Western Digital® PC SN720 NVMe™ SSD 1TB for boot drive
  • Diskspd-2.0.21a as I/O workload generator
  • Intel XA-520 10Gb dual SFP+ port
  • Windows® 10 Pro
  • One, 9 bay (5x 3.5” + 4x 2.5”) QNAP TS963-X NAS updated to the latest software release:
  • One 10Gbe Switch QNAP QSW-804-4C to connect the host PC to the NAS, using an SFP+ electrical cable. We used the Ethernet switch to simulate a real SOHO environment.

We created 2 storage pools: one made with a RAID6 of 3+2 HDDs, and a second one (after running the hybrid configuration tests) based only on the four SSDs assembled in a RAID5 (3+1) to maximize the full flash capacity. The formatted capacity was 16.35TB for Storage Pool 1 and 2.43TB for the full flash Storage Pool 2. All NAS access was made through the 10Gbe port on the TS-963X.

Here’s an image of the storage pools being setup on the QNAP interface.

Storage and snapshots
storage pools being set up on the QNAP interface

Hybrid Configuration

We used a RAID6 of 3+2 HDDs. Then, we built a RAID1 made of two, 1TB drives – each a WD Red NAS SSD. This RAID1 served as a cache for the nearly 8TB of data capacity created on the QNAP device.

To avoid large cache effects, four files of 500GB were used to generate the I/O workload. We decided to focus on the 128KB transfer size to realistically simulate an average file size. In addition, we used working threads to simulate a certain number of clients simultaneously accessing the NAS system.

With diskspd, each thread accesses each file. Thus, using eight working threads with four files replicates an environment with 32 clients accessing NAS. We then ran the tests with a growing number of clients, a workload of up to 30 percent writes, and up to four outstanding requests.

SATA SSD's
Graph 1. RAID6 Cached vs. Non-Cached Test Results – 100 % Random Workload – 128KB Transfer Size

As the results show, cached RAID6 outperformed non-cached in every scenario tested. In many cases, using WD Red NAS SSDs as a cache boosted MIB/s by 50 percent or more. The gap grew even greater when fewer clients were connecting to the NAS. Since data was accessed randomly, performance improved as the number of writes increased because all writes were cached. The opposite was also true: fewer writes and more reads led to slightly slower speeds.

Full Flash Configuration

In addition to a hybrid configuration, we also tested an all-flash NAS arrangement. We broke the cache and assembled a full flash storage pool with four, 1TB WD Red NAS SSDs.

We decided in this run to use a set of benchmarks with up to 50 percent writes and varying transfer sizes of 4K, 8K (to simulate online database access) and 128KB (for file access). The results below are for 8 clients – also called “threads” – per 1 TB file with full random access.

Overall, we found that increasing the number of clients in this test did not increase performance. This result implied that we were hitting a wall. Still, the results were impressive, as we managed to sustain over 15,000 IOPS from a RAID5 of four drives. To compare it to the raw SSD specification, this is not run on a single drive; there is a filesystem and the devices are not directly attached to the host, but connected through the network.

Graph 2. Full Flash Test Results – 100% Random Workload

Then, we tested sequential access in an all-flash configuration. We selected the 128KB transfer size, which is realistic for file access, and ran the tests with 8 outstanding requests over a single thread. Using a single thread ensured sequential access, and we avoided reaching the SATA limit of 32 outstanding requests.

As we expected, mixing reads and writes limited total performance. The more that the workload shifted to reads than writes, the better the performance in this full flash sequential layout. In fact, a workload with 100 percent reads had nearly 3x the performance of a mixed workload split between reads and writes. It’s worth noting that the test was run through a single 10Gb Ethernet port.

Graph 3. Full Flash Test Results – Sequential Workload

Conclusion – Strong Performance for Caching and Tiering

We wanted to test the WD Red NAS SSD as a caching device for both hybrid and full flash NAS configurations. In many regards, the performance results were outstanding. Our cached results show we can achieve more than a 50 percent boost in performance over non-flash configurations – with even higher peaks.

To sum it all up, the WD Red NAS SATA SSD gives a huge boost to NAS SOHO applications. As I mentioned before, these drives are designed specifically for caching through tiered data storage. If a low number of writes and non-continuous sustained performance is needed, however, full flash applications are feasible. I encourage you to learn more about our family of SSDs across enterprise, consumer, and SMBs.

Learn More about NAS SSDs

Related Stories

AI Evens the Playing Field in Sports